🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," commented one European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow this path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that governments around the world are no longer content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.